As usual i d have to agree completely with what mark said about vinyl vs.
Wav vs vinyl.
Vinyl for the most part avoided the loudness war.
Vinyl is far more high quality.
Because vinyl s restrictions do not permit the same abuse of audio levels as the cd mayo says that listeners might hear a wider dynamic range in an album mixed separately for vinyl over a compact.
It sounds just as great as the producer or band intended.
This means that the waveforms from a vinyl recording can be much more accurate and that can be heard in the richness of the sound.
And to summarize going from a source recording vinyl cd to mp3 while preserving the best quality possible would be source 16 bit stereo 44 1k sampling wav 256kb mp3.
See our youtube debate.
That s why snare drums cymbal splashes and other loud instruments have so much more punch in vinyl recordings.
But there is a downside any specks of dust or damage to the disc can be heard as noise or static.
Sonically vinyl has both.
There s another far superior reason why vinyl is better than lossy digital formats.
But for most of the parts the wav is uncompressed and carries a large data and sound details.
The results may surprise you as they did us.
We compare the sound quality of analog vinyl vs digital audio cd flac on a 100k stereo setup.
Listen to vinyl like music on vox.
Check out our listening results.
Using vinyl record is one of the most interesting practices for music lovers.
Vinyl can still push music to the limits of its dynamic range 55 70db but it often shies away from doing so in order to maintain sound quality.
No audio data is lost when pressing a record.
The vinyl lp is a format based on technology that hasn t evolved much over the last six decades.
Digitalizing these records can result in the quality decline.
